Diverging price trends among precious metals
Precious metals in a downtrend over 2018 is a story of the more obvious. The failing gold rally early in the year and the breakdown of silver leading to a gold/silver ratio now over 86. Platinum is another horror story: longs were lured in a failing rally of this denser precious metal. Yet by mid August, platinum plunged to $767. Even during the four year gold bear market, platinum had not seen such price level. Today (30 Nov), Platinum again is to close below $800/Oz, making the Gold/Platinum ratio rise to 1.533. Two ounces of gold now buy over three ounces of platinum.Diverging price trends: Palladium made another multi year closing high of $1174 on Nov 29, while today Pd was even peaking at $1190 intra-day before profit taking drove the price down again. It probably only is a matter of weeks before palladium will be at parity with gold.
The counter-trend precious metal by excellence however is rhodium. This rarest metal completely ignored the 2016 gold recovery. On the contrary: Rhodium slid below $600/Oz as gold peaked. The difference can't be larger now. An ounce of rhodium buys about two ounces of gold. The rhodium uptrend has been ongoing for over a year, with only minor hick-ups.
1 year rhodium prices. |
The Palladium price has been more correlated with the other precious metals, plunging to a mid August low. Yet the Palladium recovery proved more resilient. |
On balance gold slid about $80/Oz over 2018 till end Nov. That's a 6.2% decline. Silver on the contrary slid 16.3% year-to-date or about 10% more. The Gold/Silver ratio now is reaching a level not seen in several years:
Gold to silver ratio over 2018 |
This brings us to the last graph: the gold to platinum ratio, which isn't any better:
Gold to platinum ratio over 2018 |
With the diverging trend between palladium and platinum the price gap between the two metals is reaching grotesque proportions:
Platinum - Palladium price gap |
In a catalytic converter for a common gasoline engine mainly palladium is used, while for the (now less popular) diesel engine more platinum is required. On the other hand, less than 40% of platinum is consumed producing catalytic converters, whereas for palladium that almost amounts to 90%, making the metal a 'one-trick pony' depending on the continued worldwide dominant use of gasoline engines. This makes the current level of the price inversion look absurd.
Who do you think is pulling the leg of the ignorant speculator?
via GIPHY
No comments:
Post a Comment